Nicholas wrote:
The language intentionally left in as a case-by-case basis, stating only that the route must a) be loreified on a map and b) be suitable within lore. This makes sense, as setting some arbitrary distance/measuring distance on our seas for this purpose is somewhat silly. The current language lets the Committee for Maritime Navigation approve routes of different lengths but say no to one that, say, crosses a third of the map in one go instead of linking up several ports (as an irl connection would likely do).
Right, I just could have sworn that we were going to say that you couldn't skip major bodies of water from one entire side to the other - basically that some place like Wysteria couldn't go all the way to Pyrencia in one go.