Roglar wrote:
In my opinion there are two important points, which have to be solved. First, the proceedings in court have to be changed, so that everyone has a fair trial. The hearings weren't really helpfull the last time, since no one really had an overview about what was happening. I will promise you, that I won't be unprepared, if a crime should happen. The truth will allways prevail!
Although I am but a serf, I was an observer present at the last trial that occurred. I'm confused as to what you mean by 'no one really had an overview'. It seemed relatively straightforward (in-lore) - the situation was presented, charges were laid against the defendant, witnesses were called. Based on the evidence, they were found not guilty - which sounds like fair justice to me. Is this not the way that such a case would be resolved? What are some examples of a specific change you could suggest to better the proceedings? While you will be prepared - you would be minister of justice, not an investigator or constable. Should not the facts and evidence determine the outcome, as opposed to suspicions?
Atryl mentioned the disorder that happened during in the last trial. With regards to those sorts of disruptions, which didn't happen in-lore, how would you address that issue?