| The Mercurian Empire http://hermertia.com/ |
|
| The Inactivity of Kings http://hermertia.com/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=864 |
Page 2 of 2 |
| Author: | Scrios V [ July 26th, 2016, 10:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Inactivity of Kings |
By the way... There is no PM from you aside from your forum post. Stop accusing people of not doing something when you are not doing it yourself. |
|
| Author: | Kyn [ July 26th, 2016, 10:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Inactivity of Kings |
Oh boy, I will keep it to the point. When it comes to the King stuff. Just fix up some of the stuff that was requested, setup a time, and people would more than likely stop in. Lots have brought up several upgrades that would probably get you an easy vote if things are completed. I have already supported you so you know where I stand. Please wait until you are back and I am sure you will be happy to see the outcome. |
|
| Author: | Kyn [ July 26th, 2016, 10:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Inactivity of Kings |
I should note, I recently did the same for Sam. He setup a time with me that worked for both, did the changes, and people are happy with what he has done. The same can be achieved for you if given the proper effort (not sitting in the corner weeping). |
|
| Author: | Scrios V [ July 26th, 2016, 10:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Inactivity of Kings |
I know you are away right now and that is fine. However, you are not even here to be part of this process, correcting areas, etc. It is difficult to fix this without your presence so I am not even sure what you are expecting. |
|
| Author: | The Regent [ July 26th, 2016, 10:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Inactivity of Kings |
I'm all for using law to encourage brainstorming and negotiation, but it seems there is little chance judicial precedings would benefit you Gimpy. If you have not sent PMs, then there is little 'bona fide' evidence that you, within reasonable effort, opened up bilateral discussions with these Kings. Neither a proof of inactivity nor an argument that your constitutional right to access to officials have been infringed. But perhaps this litigious bout has encouraged discussion and clarity in the end. |
|
| Author: | Gimpy V [ July 27th, 2016, 3:46 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Inactivity of Kings |
The law states inactivity if a king doesn't respond to something that they should be responding to. Read my 3 different posts Scrios asking what I need done, you have told me nothing other than the blue line which is done. I did this not because I believe you were inactive, any of you I know none of you were, but because I felt I wasn't receiving anything from any of you. I asked for pms, I asked for posts, none of this was done, please show me where you have told me what I need to do in the past. |
|
| Author: | Scrios V [ July 27th, 2016, 3:48 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Inactivity of Kings |
It is in your post post now that is relating to all of this. Meet the requirements and it is all good. No sense in going back and forth with this. |
|
| Page 2 of 2 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|