Involuntary Inactivity - A king may become involuntarily inactive as well. A king may resume activity immediately upon stating they are active again and participating in the discussions again. The conditions for being declared Involuntarily inactive are;

a) Not posting anything for a period of three years

b) Ignoring discussions that require king input in the Diplomatic Court for four years.

I believe these conditions have been met by Scrios, Arjen and Kyn. I have yet to receive a pm or a post here or in general and I have requested them multiple times. This is a post which demands the attention of the Kings.

A) Because we need more kings at the moment and I am a potential candidate.
B) Because I have requested their attention way too many times.

Until I hear from them they will hereby be declared inactive. (Not in effect until I have confirmation from the minister of justice or another king)

_________________
Gimpy/The Italian Stallion

It's a dangerous business, Frodo, going out of your door, You step into the Road, and if you don't keep your feet, there is no knowing where you might be swept off to." -Bilbo Baggins

Duke of Kaine

Might need some of the language squared up to make sense of this fully, I know you're on your phone so it's a little bit more difficult.

Is this another proposal for the inactivity laws of current Kings/Dukes?

_________________
Petra Ravnikaar of The Veil

No I'm saying that Scrios and Arjen are inactive as the law states they need to respond to discussions that require their input. (I missed a link lol)

_________________
Gimpy/The Italian Stallion

It's a dangerous business, Frodo, going out of your door, You step into the Road, and if you don't keep your feet, there is no knowing where you might be swept off to." -Bilbo Baggins

Duke of Kaine

Should we make an official Stickied Post or something in the Council of the Crowned forum?

_________________
Petra Ravnikaar of The Veil

Interesting legal development. I will follow closely too. I mean, the sir potentially has a point, and a court order might be required if no action is met within a timely manner. That itself is a lengthy process though, for it would trigger formal judicial proceedings.

If you'd like, I posted it here first to make sure I was in the right in claiming this.

_________________
Gimpy/The Italian Stallion

It's a dangerous business, Frodo, going out of your door, You step into the Road, and if you don't keep your feet, there is no knowing where you might be swept off to." -Bilbo Baggins

Duke of Kaine

And would it Regent? When has someone being inactive needed a court order in the past? I'm just curious about this.

_________________
Gimpy/The Italian Stallion

It's a dangerous business, Frodo, going out of your door, You step into the Road, and if you don't keep your feet, there is no knowing where you might be swept off to." -Bilbo Baggins

Duke of Kaine

What do you mean by Inactive? Not sure where this is leading but I have been here the entire time and so has Kyn? We have also answered things that need to be answered? Please clarify.

_________________
Scrios V
King of Perth, Brother of Valyria

Tread lightly when you call out those that are actually active.

_________________
Scrios V
King of Perth, Brother of Valyria

It shouldn't go to court, and I think this one won't. But if there is argument citing the letter of the law, and yet different parties disputed, I'd say that could go to a court.

In this case I don't think there is a clear case of inactivity, although gimpy does deserve 'access to officials' which is a long-standing rite. The threat of court helps encourage mediation. Perhaps all this already triggered conversations and pms?

I'm just rambling btw cuz I'm passing time at a bar. Not making a stand one way or the other on this item.